Fakers and Floodgates

Authors

Sandra F. Sperino, University of Cincinnati College of LawFollow

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2014

Abstract

There has always been the possibility of judicial skepticism about employment discrimination claims. Recently, the Supreme Court made this skepticism explicit. In University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. Nassar, the Supreme Court expressed concern about fake claims and floodgates of litigation. It then used these arguments to tip the substantive law against retaliation claims. This article responds to this explicit skepticism about discrimination claims. First, it shows that the Court created reasons to limit retaliation claims that are not tied to congressional intent. Second, the factual claims that the Court makes are not grounded in evidence, and available information suggests the opposite conclusion. Third, a change to the substantive law will not prevent spurious claims. Fourth, the fakers and floodgates arguments could become accepted and embedded in judicial doctrine. Finally, it shows that Nassar is symptomatic of the broader issue that courts use procedure and substance to impede factually intensive civil rights claims.

Recommended Citation

Sperino, Sandra F., "Fakers and Floodgates" (2014). Faculty Articles and Other Publications. 291.
https://scholarship.law.uc.edu/fac_pubs/291