Building Resilience by Removing Barriers: Addressing Structural Impediments to Advocacy by Nonprofit Organizations on Behalf of the Unenfranchised

Authors

Kirsten Widner, University of Tennessee
Heather M. Kolinsky, University of Florida Levin School of Law

Abstract

Charitable contributions, particularly from private foundations, are an essential source of support for many nonprofit charitable organizations. However, the ability to accept these contributions comes with significant restrictions on lobbying and advocacy. Using vulnerability theory and an original survey of nonprofit advocacy organizations, we show that current restrictions on 501(c)(3) organizations disproportionally limit advocacy on behalf of the most politically disadvantaged groups—those without the right to vote. This, in turn, reinforces existing inequalities in whose voices are heard and whose interests are considered by policymakers. This Article argues that reforming the laws that structure what organizations can take tax-deductible charitable contributions and the purposes for which those contributions can be used is essential to building a more responsive state and improving resilience among the unenfranchised.

Recommended Citation

Kirsten Widner and Heather M. Kolinsky, Building Resilience by Removing Barriers: Addressing Structural Impediments to Advocacy by Nonprofit Organizations on Behalf of the Unenfranchised, 92 U. Cin. L. Rev. 786 (2024)
Available at: https://scholarship.law.uc.edu/uclr/vol92/iss3/4